Article 39 – Certain Principles of Policy to Be Followed by the State

19 Min Read

Article 39 of the Constitution of India lays down important Directive Principles of State Policy concerning social and economic justice. It directs the State to frame its policies towards securing adequate means of livelihood, equitable distribution of resources, prevention of concentration of wealth, equal pay for equal work and protection of workers and children.

Article 39 is one of the most significant provisions in Part IV because it translates the broader objective of social and economic justice into specific constitutional principles that should guide legislation and public policy.

Meaning of Article 39

Article 39 requires the State to direct its policy towards securing certain social and economic objectives for its citizens.

Unlike a Fundamental Right, Article 39 does not give individuals a directly enforceable claim before a court. Instead, it provides constitutional guidance to the State when it makes laws and formulates policies.

The provision focuses particularly on economic equality, distributive justice, livelihood, labour protection and the welfare of children.

Constitutional Basis

Article 39 is contained in Part IV of the Constitution, which deals with the Directive Principles of State Policy.

It must be read along with Article 37, which provides that the Directive Principles are not enforceable by any court but are fundamental in the governance of the country.

Article 39 contains six important principles, set out in clauses (a) to (f).

Article 39(a) – Adequate Means of Livelihood

Article 39(a) directs the State to ensure that citizens, men and women equally, have the right to an adequate means of livelihood.

The principle recognises that meaningful social and economic justice requires people to have access to sufficient means of supporting themselves.

The provision does not create an independently enforceable right to employment or income. Instead, it establishes a constitutional objective that should guide State policy.

The emphasis on men and women equally also reflects the Constitution’s commitment to equality and non-discrimination.

Article 39(b) – Distribution of Material Resources

Article 39(b) directs the State to ensure that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are distributed in such a way as to best subserve the common good.

The provision is concerned with the use and distribution of resources for the benefit of society as a whole.

The expression material resources of the community has received considerable attention from the Supreme Court, particularly in constitutional cases involving property, economic legislation and distributive justice.

The objective is not simply ownership by the State. The central constitutional concern is whether the ownership and control of resources serve the common good.

Article 39(c) – Prevention of Concentration of Wealth

Article 39(c) directs the State to ensure that the operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment.

The provision seeks to prevent an economic structure in which wealth and productive resources become concentrated in ways that harm society as a whole.

It reflects the constitutional commitment to reducing extreme economic inequality.

Article 39(c) is therefore closely connected with the broader objective of economic justice contained in Article 38.

Article 39(d) – Equal Pay for Equal Work

Article 39(d) directs the State to ensure equal pay for equal work for both men and women.

The principle seeks to prevent discrimination in remuneration where the work performed is substantially equal.

Although Article 39(d) is a Directive Principle and is not directly enforceable by itself, the principle of equal pay has played an important role in constitutional and labour law.

Courts have considered the principle alongside Article 14, Article 16 and other equality guarantees where appropriate.

Article 39(e) – Protection of Workers

Article 39(e) directs the State to ensure that:

  • The health and strength of workers, men and women, are not abused.
  • Citizens are not forced by economic necessity to enter occupations unsuited to their age or strength.

The provision reflects the constitutional concern that economic necessity should not lead to exploitation.

It recognises that workers require protection from working conditions that adversely affect their health, safety or dignity.

Article 39(f) – Protection of Children

Article 39(f) directs the State to ensure that children are given opportunities and facilities to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity.

It further seeks to protect childhood and youth against:

  • Exploitation
  • Moral and material abandonment

The provision reflects the Constitution’s emphasis on the welfare and development of children.

It is closely connected with other constitutional provisions concerning children, particularly Article 21A and Article 24.

Article 39 at a Glance

ClausePrinciple
Article 39(a)Adequate means of livelihood for men and women equally
Article 39(b)Distribution of material resources for the common good
Article 39(c)Prevention of concentration of wealth and means of production
Article 39(d)Equal pay for equal work for men and women
Article 39(e)Protection of workers’ health and strength against exploitation
Article 39(f)Protection and healthy development of children

Article 39(a) – Key Point

The focus of Article 39(a) is livelihood.

The State is expected to create conditions in which citizens can secure an adequate means of supporting themselves.

It does not mean that every citizen has a directly enforceable Fundamental Right to a particular job or income under Article 39(a).

Article 39(b) – Key Point

The focus of Article 39(b) is distribution of resources for the common good.

The provision supports the idea that material resources should be managed in a manner that benefits the community rather than being used solely for private advantage.

Article 39(c) – Key Point

The focus of Article 39(c) is economic concentration.

The State should work to prevent the economic system from producing excessive concentration of wealth and productive resources to the detriment of society.

Article 39(d) – Key Point

The focus of Article 39(d) is equal remuneration.

Men and women performing equal work should receive equal pay, subject to the legal principles governing what constitutes equal work.

Article 39(e) – Key Point

The focus of Article 39(e) is protection against exploitation of workers.

The State should ensure that economic necessity does not result in the abuse of workers’ health and strength.

Article 39(f) – Key Point

The focus of Article 39(f) is child welfare and development.

Children should have opportunities to develop in conditions of health, freedom and dignity and should be protected against exploitation and abandonment.

Article 39 and Article 38

Articles 38 and 39 are closely connected.

Article 38 provides the broader objective of establishing a social order based on social, economic and political justice and reducing inequalities.

Article 39 provides more specific principles through which the State can pursue these objectives.

A simple distinction is:

Article 38 → Broad objective of welfare, justice and reduction of inequalities

Article 39 → Specific social and economic policy principles

Article 39 and Article 14

Article 14 guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws.

Article 39 contains specific social and economic principles that support substantive equality.

The relationship between the two provisions is particularly relevant to Article 39(d), which concerns equal pay for equal work.

The Supreme Court has recognised that Directive Principles may assist in understanding the constitutional commitment to equality, although Article 39 itself is not directly enforceable.

Constitutional Law Notes

Article 39(d) and Equal Pay for Equal Work

The principle of equal pay for equal work has received significant judicial attention.

In Randhir Singh v. Union of India (1982), the Supreme Court recognised equal pay for equal work as a constitutional goal that could be derived from the broader equality principles, including Articles 14 and 16, read with Article 39(d).

The case is important because it illustrates how a Directive Principle can influence the interpretation and application of enforceable constitutional rights.

Article 39(b) and Material Resources

The expression material resources of the community has been the subject of major constitutional litigation.

The Supreme Court has considered the scope of Article 39(b) in cases involving the acquisition and distribution of property and resources.

The interpretation of this provision has evolved over time, particularly in cases concerning the relationship between Article 39(b), property rights and constitutional amendments.

Article 39(b) and Article 31C

Article 31C was introduced to provide constitutional protection to certain laws giving effect to the principles specified in Article 39(b) and Article 39(c).

However, the scope and constitutional validity of Article 31C have been significantly shaped by Supreme Court decisions.

The present constitutional position must therefore be understood through the interpretation given by the Court to Article 31C and the Basic Structure Doctrine.

Article 39 and Children

Article 39(f) forms part of the constitutional framework for protecting children.

It works alongside provisions such as:

  • Article 21A – Right to education
  • Article 24 – Prohibition of employment of children in certain hazardous occupations
  • Article 15(3) – Special provisions for children
  • Article 45 – Early childhood care and education

Together, these provisions demonstrate the Constitution’s broader concern with child welfare, education, development and protection from exploitation.

Article 39 and Labour Welfare

Article 39(e) and Article 39(d) are particularly relevant to labour welfare.

They reflect constitutional objectives concerning:

  • Fair remuneration
  • Protection of workers
  • Health and safety
  • Prevention of exploitation
  • Equality between men and women

These principles have influenced labour legislation and judicial interpretation.

Important Cases

Randhir Singh v. Union of India (1982)

The Supreme Court recognised the principle of equal pay for equal work as a constitutional goal and considered Article 39(d) alongside Articles 14 and 16.

The case is particularly important for understanding how Directive Principles can influence the interpretation of Fundamental Rights.

Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (1983)

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional significance of Article 39(b) in the context of legislation dealing with the ownership and control of resources.

The case is relevant to the understanding of the common-good objective underlying Article 39(b).

State of Karnataka v. Shri Ranganatha Reddy (1977)

The Supreme Court considered the meaning and scope of material resources of the community in the context of Article 39(b).

The judgment is important in understanding the constitutional debate surrounding distribution and control of material resources.

Property Owners Association v. State of Maharashtra (2024)

The Supreme Court considered the meaning of “material resources of the community” under Article 39(b), particularly in relation to whether privately owned resources can fall within its scope.

The judgment is important for understanding the contemporary constitutional position concerning Article 39(b).

Article 39 and the Welfare State

Article 39 is an important constitutional foundation for the idea of a welfare state.

Its principles require the State to consider not only economic growth but also:

  • Distribution of resources
  • Livelihood
  • Equality
  • Labour protection
  • Child welfare
  • Prevention of economic exploitation

The provision therefore reflects the Constitution’s broader commitment to social and economic democracy.

Important Features of Article 39

1. Directive Principle

Article 39 forms part of the Directive Principles of State Policy.

2. Six Constitutional Principles

It contains clauses from (a) to (f) dealing with different aspects of social and economic policy.

3. Focus on Social and Economic Justice

The provision seeks to promote economic welfare and reduce exploitation and inequality.

4. Equal Pay

Article 39(d) specifically recognises equal pay for equal work for men and women.

5. Resource Distribution

Article 39(b) focuses on the distribution of material resources for the common good.

6. Prevention of Economic Concentration

Article 39(c) seeks to prevent concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment.

7. Protection of Workers and Children

Clauses (e) and (f) provide constitutional directions for protecting workers and children.

Article 39 and Related Constitutional Provisions

ArticleSubjectConnection with Article 39
Article 14Equality before lawSupports equality-related principles
Article 15(3)Special provisions for women and childrenSupports protection of children
Article 16Equality in public employmentRelevant to equality in employment
Article 21Life and personal libertyInterpreted in light of broader constitutional values
Article 21ARight to educationSupports child development
Article 23Prohibition of trafficking and forced labourSupports protection against exploitation
Article 24Child labour in hazardous employmentSupports Article 39(e) and (f)
Article 38Social order and welfareProvides broader objective
Article 39AEqual justice and free legal aidSupports social justice
Article 45Early childhood care and educationSupports child welfare
Article 46Weaker sectionsSupports social justice

Common Confusions

Does Article 39 Give a Direct Right to Employment?

No.

Article 39(a) directs the State to ensure adequate means of livelihood, but it does not by itself create a directly enforceable right to a particular job.

Is Equal Pay for Equal Work a Fundamental Right Under Article 39(d)?

Article 39(d) itself is a Directive Principle and is not directly enforceable.

However, the principle of equal pay for equal work has been considered by courts alongside Fundamental Rights, particularly Articles 14 and 16.

Does Article 39(b) Mean That All Property Must Be Owned by the State?

No.

Article 39(b) concerns the ownership and control of material resources of the community and their distribution in a manner that best serves the common good.

It does not establish a blanket requirement that all property must be State-owned.

Does Article 39(c) Require Equal Distribution of Wealth?

No.

It directs the State to prevent the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment.

The objective is to reduce harmful economic concentration, not necessarily to create identical levels of wealth.

Is Article 39 Directly Enforceable?

No.

Like other Directive Principles, Article 39 is not directly enforceable by courts because of Article 37.

Quick Revision

  • Article 39 → Certain principles of policy to be followed by the State.
  • It is a Directive Principle of State Policy.
  • Article 39(a) → Adequate means of livelihood.
  • Article 39(b) → Distribution of material resources for the common good.
  • Article 39(c) → Prevention of concentration of wealth and means of production.
  • Article 39(d) → Equal pay for equal work for men and women.
  • Article 39(e) → Protection of workers against exploitation.
  • Article 39(f) → Healthy development and protection of children.
  • Article 39 is not directly enforceable.
  • Article 38 → Broad objective of welfare and reduction of inequalities.
  • Article 39 → Specific social and economic policy principles.

Conclusion

Article 39 gives concrete expression to the Constitution’s commitment to social and economic justice. Its six clauses address livelihood, distribution of resources, economic concentration, equal pay, protection of workers and the welfare of children.

Although the principles are not directly enforceable, they provide important constitutional guidance for legislation and public policy. They also have influenced judicial interpretation of Fundamental Rights and the broader relationship between Parts III and IV.

The key point to remember is:

Article 39 → Livelihood, distribution of resources, prevention of economic concentration, equal pay, worker protection and child welfare.

Lexibal app
Share This Article
Newsletter Signup

👀 Attention, Lex Fam!

Lexibal is trusted by a community of 100K+ and growing law students and legal professionals across India. A fast-growing legal community that’s learning, sharing, and leveling up together — and you’re invited to be part of it too.

Newsletter Signup

Social Media

Stay Connected

Follow Lexibal on your favourite platforms.

Instagram
Follow
Telegram
Join
- Advertisement -
Join WhatsApp