Article 15 – Prohibition of Discrimination on Grounds of Religion, Race, Caste, Sex or Place of Birth

20 Min Read

Article 15 of the Constitution of India is an important provision under the Right to Equality. It prohibits discrimination against citizens on specified grounds and also permits the State to make certain special provisions for groups that require constitutional protection or assistance.

Article 15 therefore combines two ideas: prohibition of certain forms of discrimination and permissible affirmative action.

The provision is closely connected with Article 14 and Article 16, but each provision operates in a different constitutional context.

Meaning of Article 15

Article 15 prohibits the State from discriminating against a citizen solely on the grounds of:

  • Religion
  • Race
  • Caste
  • Sex
  • Place of birth

It also prohibits discrimination on these grounds in access to certain public spaces and facilities.

At the same time, clauses (3) to (6) permit the State to make specified special provisions for women, children, socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and economically weaker sections.

Thus, Article 15 is not simply a prohibition provision. It also recognises that substantive equality may require special measures for disadvantaged groups.

Constitutional Text of Article 15

Article 15 contains six clauses:

  • Article 15(1) prohibits discrimination by the State against citizens on specified grounds.
  • Article 15(2) prohibits certain forms of discrimination in access to public places and facilities.
  • Article 15(3) permits special provisions for women and children.
  • Article 15(4) permits special provisions for socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
  • Article 15(5) permits special provisions relating to admission to educational institutions for certain backward classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
  • Article 15(6) permits special provisions for economically weaker sections.

Understanding these clauses separately is essential for examinations.

Article 15(1) – Prohibition of Discrimination by the State

Article 15(1) provides that the State shall not discriminate against any citizen only on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them.

There are two important aspects of this provision.

First, it applies to citizens.

Second, the prohibited discrimination must be on the ground of one or more of the specified factors.

The provision therefore does not prohibit every form of differential treatment.

Grounds Mentioned in Article 15(1)

Religion

The State cannot discriminate against a citizen solely because of their religion.

Race

Discrimination based solely on race is prohibited.

Caste

The Constitution specifically prohibits discrimination based solely on caste.

Sex

Discrimination solely on the ground of sex is prohibited.

The constitutional framework also permits special provisions benefiting women and children under Article 15(3).

Place of Birth

The State cannot discriminate against a citizen solely because of their place of birth.

It is important to distinguish place of birth from residence because they are not constitutionally identical concepts.

The Word “Only”

The word “only” in Article 15(1) is important.

The provision prohibits discrimination where the prohibited ground is the sole basis of the discrimination.

If a classification is based on a constitutionally permissible consideration and the prohibited ground is not the sole basis, the analysis may be different.

This does not mean that the State can disguise prohibited discrimination by adding another factor. Courts examine the substance and effect of the classification.

Article 15(2) – Access to Public Places

Article 15(2) extends the protection beyond direct State action.

It provides that no citizen shall, on the grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth, be subjected to any disability, liability, restriction or condition with regard to:

  • Access to shops
  • Public restaurants
  • Hotels
  • Places of public entertainment
  • The use of wells
  • Tanks
  • Bathing ghats
  • Roads
  • Places of public resort

where such facilities are maintained wholly or partly out of State funds or dedicated to the use of the general public.

This provision is important because it addresses discriminatory exclusion from spaces and facilities used by the public.

Article 15(1) and Article 15(2)

The two clauses should not be confused.

Article 15(1)Article 15(2)
Deals with discrimination by the StateDeals with specified disabilities, restrictions or conditions concerning public access
Protects citizensProtects citizens
Applies to specified groundsApplies to specified grounds
Focuses on State discriminationCovers access to specified public places and facilities

Article 15(3) – Special Provisions for Women and Children

Article 15(3) states that nothing in Article 15 shall prevent the State from making special provision for women and children.

This recognises that treating everyone identically may not always produce substantive equality.

The State may therefore adopt measures intended to protect or advance women and children.

Examples may include laws or policies designed to provide special protection, welfare or opportunities to women or children.

Such measures are not automatically considered unconstitutional discrimination merely because they treat one group differently.

Constitutional Law Notes

Article 15(4) – Socially and Educationally Backward Classes, SCs and STs

Article 15(4) permits the State to make special provisions for the advancement of:

  • Socially and educationally backward classes
  • Scheduled Castes
  • Scheduled Tribes

This clause was inserted by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951.

It represents an important development in the constitutional approach to equality.

The Constitution recognises that historical and social disadvantages may require affirmative measures to achieve substantive equality.

State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan

The decision in State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan played an important role in the development of Article 15(4).

The Supreme Court struck down the communal allocation of seats in educational institutions under the relevant arrangement because it was inconsistent with the Fundamental Rights then applicable.

The decision was followed by the First Constitutional Amendment, which inserted Article 15(4).

The case is therefore important for understanding the historical development of affirmative action under Article 15.

Article 15(5) – Admission to Educational Institutions

Article 15(5) was inserted by the Constitution (Ninety-Third Amendment) Act, 2005.

It permits the State to make special provisions, by law, for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in relation to their admission to educational institutions.

This can include:

  • Public educational institutions
  • Private educational institutions

However, Article 15(5) expressly excludes minority educational institutions referred to in Article 30(1).

This exception is important and should be remembered for examinations.

Article 15(4) and Article 15(5)

Both provisions concern affirmative action for certain disadvantaged groups, but they operate in different contexts.

Article 15(4)Article 15(5)
Special provisions for advancementSpecial provisions relating to admission to educational institutions
Applies to SEBCs, SCs and STsApplies to SEBCs, SCs and STs
Inserted by First AmendmentInserted by Ninety-Third Amendment
Broader advancement provisionSpecifically addresses educational admissions
Does not contain the same Article 30(1) exclusionExpressly excludes minority educational institutions under Article 30(1)

Article 15(6) – Economically Weaker Sections

Article 15(6) was inserted by the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019.

It permits the State to make special provisions for the advancement of economically weaker sections of citizens.

These provisions may relate to:

  • Admission to educational institutions
  • Reservation in educational institutions

The provision applies to institutions covered by Article 15(5), subject to the constitutional framework.

Article 15(6) also permits a separate provision for reservation in educational institutions for economically weaker sections, in addition to existing reservations, subject to the constitutional limits specified by the provision.

Economically Weaker Sections

The introduction of Article 15(6) marked an important development because it expressly introduced economic criteria into the constitutional framework of affirmative action under Article 15.

The constitutional validity of the 103rd Amendment was considered by the Supreme Court in Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India.

The Court upheld the constitutional validity of the amendment by majority.

Article 15 and Reservation

Article 15 contains several provisions that enable affirmative action.

These include:

  • Article 15(3) – Women and children
  • Article 15(4) – Socially and educationally backward classes, SCs and STs
  • Article 15(5) – Admission to educational institutions for specified backward groups
  • Article 15(6) – Economically weaker sections

Therefore, reservation and other special provisions under Article 15 should not be viewed as exceptions completely separate from equality.

They form part of the Constitution’s broader approach to achieving substantive equality.

Formal Equality and Substantive Equality

Formal equality focuses on treating similarly situated people alike.

Substantive equality recognises that people may begin from different social, economic or historical circumstances and may require different treatment to achieve genuine equality.

Article 15 reflects both approaches.

Clauses (1) and (2) prohibit specified forms of discrimination, while clauses (3) to (6) permit particular forms of affirmative action.

Article 15 and Article 14

Article 14 provides the broader guarantee of equality before law and equal protection of laws.

Article 15 deals specifically with discrimination on certain grounds.

Article 14Article 15
General equality guaranteeSpecific prohibition of discrimination
Applies to “any person”Articles 15(1) and 15(2) concern citizens
Includes equality before law and equal protectionDeals with specified grounds of discrimination
Permits reasonable classificationContains specific provisions permitting special measures
Broader in scopeMore specific constitutional protection

The two provisions often operate together.

Article 15 and Article 16

Article 15 and Article 16 both address equality, but they concern different contexts.

Article 15 primarily deals with discrimination generally and access to specified public spaces and opportunities, along with special provisions in areas such as education.

Article 16 specifically concerns equality of opportunity in matters of public employment.

This distinction is frequently tested in law examinations.

Article 15 and Article 17

Article 15 prohibits discrimination on specified grounds.

Article 17 separately abolishes untouchability and prohibits its practice in any form.

Caste-based discrimination can therefore raise issues under multiple constitutional provisions depending on the nature of the conduct.

Article 15 and Intersectional Discrimination

Discrimination does not always operate through a single characteristic.

A person may experience discrimination involving multiple factors such as caste, sex or religion.

The constitutional text of Article 15 recognises discrimination based on the listed grounds or any of them.

The provision must therefore be understood in its constitutional context rather than as a set of completely isolated categories.

Important Cases on Article 15

State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan

Important for the historical development of affirmative action and the insertion of Article 15(4).

M.R. Balaji v. State of Mysore

The Supreme Court considered the scope of reservation and special provisions under Article 15(4).

The decision is important in the development of constitutional principles concerning backward classes and reservation.

Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity and scope of reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in educational institutions.

The case is relevant to Article 15(5).

Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India

The Supreme Court considered a provision that restricted women from working in establishments serving liquor.

The Court emphasised that protective legislation cannot simply rely on stereotypes about women and must be consistent with constitutional equality.

The case is useful for understanding sex-based discrimination and substantive equality.

Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India

The Supreme Court considered constitutional protection against discrimination and dignity in the context of sexual orientation.

The judgment is important to the broader development of equality jurisprudence under Part III, including the understanding of discrimination and constitutional morality.

Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment, which introduced provisions for economically weaker sections.

The majority upheld the constitutional validity of the amendment.

Important Amendments Related to Article 15

AmendmentYearSignificance
First Constitutional Amendment1951Inserted Article 15(4)
Ninety-Third Constitutional Amendment2005Inserted Article 15(5)
One Hundred and Third Constitutional Amendment2019Inserted Article 15(6)

These amendments demonstrate the development of the constitutional approach to equality and affirmative action.

Important Features of Article 15

1. Prohibits Specified Discrimination

Article 15(1) prohibits discrimination against citizens on specified grounds.

2. Protects Access to Public Facilities

Article 15(2) addresses discriminatory restrictions concerning specified public places and facilities.

3. Permits Special Provisions for Women and Children

Article 15(3) permits such provisions.

4. Permits Special Provisions for Backward Classes

Article 15(4) covers socially and educationally backward classes, SCs and STs.

5. Covers Educational Admissions

Article 15(5) permits specified special provisions relating to admission to educational institutions.

6. Recognises Economically Weaker Sections

Article 15(6) provides for special provisions for EWS.

7. Promotes Substantive Equality

The provision recognises that affirmative measures may sometimes be necessary to address disadvantage.

Common Confusions

Confusion 1: Article 15 Prohibits Every Form of Differential Treatment

No.

Article 15 prohibits discrimination on specified grounds in the circumstances covered by the provision, while clauses (3) to (6) expressly permit certain forms of special treatment.

Confusion 2: Article 15 Applies to Everyone

Articles 15(1) and 15(2) use the term “citizen”.

This differs from Article 14, which uses the expression “any person.”

Confusion 3: Article 15(4) Was Part of the Original Constitution

No.

Article 15(4) was inserted by the First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951.

Confusion 4: Article 15(5) Applies to Every Educational Institution

No.

Article 15(5) expressly excludes minority educational institutions referred to in Article 30(1).

Confusion 5: Article 15 and Article 16 Are the Same

No.

Article 15 concerns specified forms of discrimination and special provisions in contexts including education, while Article 16 specifically deals with equality of opportunity in public employment.

Confusion 6: Equality Requires the Same Treatment for Everyone

No.

The Constitution recognises substantive equality and permits specified affirmative measures for disadvantaged groups.

Exam Relevance

Article 15 is important for:

  • Constitutional Law examinations
  • Judiciary examinations
  • CLAT and law entrance examinations
  • Right to Equality
  • Reservation
  • Affirmative action
  • Discrimination
  • Gender equality
  • Educational admissions
  • Socially and educationally backward classes
  • Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
  • Economically weaker sections

Important Cases to Remember

CasePrinciple / Significance
State of Madras v. Champakam DorairajanImportant in the development of Article 15(4)
M.R. Balaji v. State of MysoreScope of special provisions under Article 15(4)
Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of IndiaReservation and Article 15(5)
Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of IndiaSex-based discrimination and gender stereotypes
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of IndiaEquality, dignity and discrimination jurisprudence
Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of IndiaConstitutional validity of EWS provisions under Article 15(6)

Important Points to Remember

ConceptWhat to Remember
ArticleArticle 15
RightRight to Equality
Article 15(1)Prohibits specified discrimination by the State
GroundsReligion, race, caste, sex and place of birth
Article 15(2)Prohibits specified discriminatory restrictions on access to public places and facilities
Article 15(3)Special provisions for women and children
Article 15(4)Special provisions for SEBCs, SCs and STs
Article 15(5)Special provisions relating to educational admissions
Article 15(6)Special provisions for economically weaker sections
Important Amendments1st, 93rd and 103rd Amendments
Important CasesChampakam Dorairajan, M.R. Balaji, Anuj Garg, Janhit Abhiyan

Quick Revision

  • Article 15 forms part of the Right to Equality.
  • Article 15(1) prohibits the State from discriminating against citizens solely on specified grounds.
  • The five expressly mentioned grounds are religion, race, caste, sex and place of birth.
  • Article 15(2) deals with access to specified public places and facilities.
  • Article 15(3) permits special provisions for women and children.
  • Article 15(4) permits special provisions for socially and educationally backward classes, SCs and STs.
  • Article 15(5) deals specifically with admission to educational institutions for specified backward groups.
  • Article 15(5) excludes minority educational institutions under Article 30(1).
  • Article 15(6) provides for special provisions for economically weaker sections.
  • Article 15 reflects both formal equality and substantive equality.
  • Article 15 should be distinguished from Article 16, which specifically concerns equality of opportunity in public employment.

Conclusion

Article 15 gives concrete constitutional protection against discrimination on specified grounds while recognising that equality may sometimes require special measures for disadvantaged groups.

Its six clauses demonstrate the development of India’s constitutional approach to equality. The provision begins with a prohibition against discrimination and then permits specific forms of affirmative action for women, children, socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and economically weaker sections.

For students, the most useful way to remember Article 15 is to understand the progression:

15(1) – No specified discrimination

15(2) – No specified discrimination in access to public places and facilities

15(3) – Special provisions for women and children

15(4) – Special provisions for SEBCs, SCs and STs

15(5) – Special provisions relating to educational admissions

15(6) – Special provisions for EWS

Share This Article
Newsletter Signup

👀 Attention, Lex Fam!

Lexibal is trusted by a community of 100K+ and growing law students and legal professionals across India. A fast-growing legal community that’s learning, sharing, and leveling up together — and you’re invited to be part of it too.

Newsletter Signup

Social Media

Stay Connected

Follow Lexibal on your favourite platforms.

Instagram
Follow
Telegram
Join
- Advertisement -
Join WhatsApp