Introduction

Section 130 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with the rule-making power of High Courts other than Chartered High Courts in relation to certain procedural matters.

The provision forms part of the CPC’s broader framework concerning the power of High Courts to regulate civil procedure through rules.

Section 130 is important because it permits High Courts other than those referred to in Section 129 to make rules concerning certain matters connected with their civil procedure.

---

Section at a Glance

Particular	Details
Section	Section 130 CPC
Subject	Rules of other High Courts
Nature	Procedural
Main purpose	To permit other High Courts to make rules concerning specified procedural matters
Courts concerned	High Courts other than those covered by Section 129
Related provisions	Sections 122–129 and 131 CPC

---

Statutory Provision

Section 130 provides a rule-making power to High Courts other than the High Courts referred to in Section 129 in relation to specified procedural matters.

The provision is therefore to be read together with Section 129.

While Section 129 deals with the special rule-making power of Chartered High Courts, Section 130 deals with the corresponding procedural rule-making framework for other High Courts.

---

Meaning of Section 130 CPC

In simple terms, Section 130 recognises that High Courts other than Chartered High Courts may also need to make procedural rules concerning the conduct of civil proceedings.

It therefore provides a mechanism for such High Courts to regulate specified procedural matters through rules.

The provision should not, however, be read as giving an unrestricted power to override the CPC.

The rules remain subject to the statutory framework governing High Court rule-making.

---

Purpose and Object of Section 130

The principal object of Section 130 is to provide procedural flexibility to High Courts other than Chartered High Courts.

Civil procedure often requires detailed rules dealing with matters of practice, procedure and administration.

The CPC establishes the general procedural framework, while Section 130 permits the appropriate High Court to formulate rules dealing with matters that require additional procedural regulation.

This allows the procedural system to adapt to the requirements of individual High Courts and their jurisdictions.

---

Section 130 and Section 129

This is the most important comparison.

Basis	Section 129	Section 130
Subject	Rules of Chartered High Courts	Rules of other High Courts
High Courts concerned	High Courts established by Letters Patent	High Courts other than those covered by Section 129
Main focus	High Court’s own procedure	Specified procedural matters
Special feature	Applies to ordinary original civil jurisdiction	Provides rule-making authority for other High Courts
Key distinction	Chartered High Court	Other High Courts

Easy Way to Remember

Section 129 → Chartered High Courts

Section 130 → Other High Courts

---

Essential Features of Section 130

1. It concerns High Courts other than those covered by Section 129

The provision is intended for High Courts that do not fall within the special category addressed by Section 129.

Therefore, Section 130 must be understood in contrast with Section 129.

---

2. It concerns procedural rule-making

The power relates to matters concerning the practice and procedure of civil proceedings.

The purpose is to provide detailed procedural regulation where the general provisions of the CPC require supplementation.

---

3. The rules remain subject to the CPC

The rule-making power under Section 130 does not permit a High Court to disregard the mandatory provisions of the CPC.

Rules made under the provision must operate within the limits imposed by the Code and the wider statutory framework.

---

Practical Example

Example: A High Court wants to establish detailed procedural rules dealing with a particular aspect of civil proceedings within its jurisdiction.

Instead of relying only on the general provisions contained in the CPC, the High Court may frame procedural rules under the relevant rule-making authority.

Those rules would regulate the practical conduct of proceedings while remaining subject to the limitations imposed by the CPC.

---

Practical Importance in Civil Litigation

Section 130 is relevant because procedural rules applicable in civil litigation are not found exclusively in the main body of the CPC.

High Courts may have their own procedural rules dealing with matters such as:

• filing and presentation of proceedings;
• procedural steps in civil cases;
• court practice;
• procedural requirements;
• conduct of proceedings; and
• other matters falling within the rule-making authority of the High Court.

Therefore, advocates must consider both the CPC itself and the applicable High Court rules when determining the correct procedure.

---

Relationship with Sections 122–131

Section 130 forms part of the CPC’s broader provisions concerning rule-making powers.

The surrounding provisions can broadly be remembered as follows:

Section	Main Subject
Section 122	Power of certain High Courts to make rules
Section 123	Constitution of Rule Committees
Section 124	Committee to report to High Court
Section 125	Power of other High Courts to make rules
Section 126	Rules subject to approval
Section 127	Publication of rules
Section 128	Matters for which rules may provide
Section 129	Rules of Chartered High Courts
Section 130	Rules of other High Courts
Section 131	Rules made by other Courts

Memory Sequence

Power → Committee → Report → Other High Courts → Approval → Publication → Matters → Chartered High Courts → Other High Courts → Other Courts

---

Section 130 vs Section 128

These provisions should also be distinguished.

Section 128

Section 128 identifies matters for which rules may provide.

Section 130

Section 130 concerns the rule-making authority of other High Courts in relation to the procedural matters falling within the statutory framework.

Therefore:

Section 128 → What can be regulated

Section 130 → Rules of other High Courts

---

Statutory Rule and Judicial Interpretation

What the CPC Provides

Section 130 forms part of the provisions dealing with procedural rule-making by High Courts.

Its function must be understood alongside Section 129, which deals specifically with Chartered High Courts.

Core Legal Principle

The important principle is that High Courts have procedural rule-making powers, but those powers operate within the boundaries established by the CPC and the relevant statutory provisions.

The existence of a High Court rule does not by itself mean that the rule can override a mandatory provision of the Code.

---

Common Confusions

1. Is Section 130 the same as Section 129?

No.

Section 129 specifically concerns High Courts established by Letters Patent.

Section 130 deals with the rule-making framework applicable to other High Courts.

---

2. Does Section 130 Give Unlimited Power?

No.

The High Court’s rule-making authority remains subject to the statutory framework governing procedural rules.

---

3. Can High Court Rules Override the CPC?

As a general principle, procedural rules cannot be used to defeat an express and mandatory provision of the CPC.

The rule-making power exists to regulate and supplement procedure, not to rewrite the Code.

---

Importance for Law Students and Judiciary Exams

Section 130 is important primarily because it follows Section 129 and distinguishes between Chartered High Courts and other High Courts.

What to Remember

1. Section 130 deals with Rules of Other High Courts.
2. It should be studied immediately after Section 129.
3. Section 129 concerns Chartered High Courts.
4. Section 130 concerns other High Courts.
5. The rule-making power is procedural in character.
6. High Court rules remain subject to the limitations imposed by the CPC.
7. Sections 129 and 130 should be remembered together.

---

Important Questions to Prepare

1. What is the object of Section 130 CPC?
2. What is meant by “other High Courts” under Section 130?
3. Distinguish Section 129 from Section 130 CPC.
4. What is the nature of the rule-making power under Section 130?
5. Can rules made by a High Court override the CPC?
6. Explain the position of Section 130 within the CPC’s rule-making framework.

---

Key Legal Principles

1. Section 130 concerns other High Courts

It deals with the procedural rule-making framework applicable to High Courts other than those specially addressed under Section 129.

2. It is procedural in nature

The provision concerns the regulation of civil procedure through High Court rules.

3. The CPC remains the governing framework

High Court rules must operate within the limits imposed by the Code.

4. Section 129 and Section 130 are complementary

Section 129 addresses Chartered High Courts, while Section 130 addresses other High Courts.

---

Key Takeaways

Concept	Principle
Section	Section 130 CPC
Subject	Rules of Other High Courts
Main purpose	Procedural rule-making by other High Courts
Section 129	Chartered High Courts
Section 130	Other High Courts
Nature	Procedural
Limitation	Rules remain subject to the CPC and applicable statutory restrictions

---

ALSO READ: Section 129 – Rules of Chartered High Courts

Conclusion

Section 130 forms part of the CPC’s framework for High Court rule-making and deals with the procedural rules of High Courts other than those covered by the special provision concerning Chartered High Courts.

The easiest way to remember the distinction is:

Section 129 → Rules of Chartered High Courts

Section 130 → Rules of Other High Courts

For examination purposes, focus on the distinction between the two provisions and remember that High Court rule-making powers operate within the limits prescribed by the CPC.