Introduction
Section 126 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with the previous approval required for rules made under the preceding rule-making provisions of the CPC.
- Introduction
- Section at a Glance
- Statutory Provision
- Meaning of Section 126 CPC
- Purpose and Object of Section 126
- Essential Requirements of Section 126
- How Section 126 CPC Works
- Section 126 and Previous Publication
- Statutory Rule and Judicial Interpretation
- Related Provisions
- Section 126 vs Section 127
- Section 125 vs Section 126
- Practical Example
- Practical Importance in Civil Litigation
- Common Confusion
- Importance for Law Students and Judiciary Exams
- Important Questions to Prepare
- Key Legal Principles
- Key Takeaways
- Conclusion
The provision forms part of the CPC’s framework governing the power of High Courts to make procedural rules. While Sections 122 and 125 deal with the power of certain High Courts to make rules, Section 126 places an additional requirement on the exercise of that power: the rules must receive the previous approval of the appropriate Government.
The section determines which Government must grant approval by looking at the location of the Court whose procedure the rules are intended to regulate.
Section at a Glance
| Particular | Details |
|---|---|
| Section | Section 126 CPC |
| Subject | Rules to be subject to approval |
| Nature | Procedural |
| Main purpose | To require previous governmental approval of rules made under the foregoing provisions |
| Court situated in a State | Approval of the Government of that State |
| Court not situated in any State | Approval of the Central Government |
| Related provisions | Sections 122, 123, 124, 125, 127 and 128 |
Statutory Provision
Section 126 provides that:
“Rules made under the foregoing provisions shall be subject to the previous approval of the Government of the State in which the Court whose procedure the rules regulate is situate or, if that Court is not situate in any State, to the previous approval of Central Government.”
The provision therefore establishes a requirement of previous approval before the rules can proceed to the publication stage contemplated by Section 127.
There are two situations:
- Where the Court whose procedure is regulated is situated in a State, approval is required from the Government of that State.
- Where the Court is not situated in any State, approval is required from the Central Government.
Meaning of Section 126 CPC
In simple terms, Section 126 means that rules made under the foregoing rule-making provisions of the CPC are not complete merely because the High Court has framed them.
They must first obtain the approval prescribed by Section 126.
The provision therefore places a statutory control on the rule-making process. The appropriate Government must approve the rules before they move to the publication stage under Section 127.
The important point is that Section 126 deals with approval, not publication.
Purpose and Object of Section 126
The purpose of Section 126 is to ensure that rules made under the CPC’s rule-making provisions are subject to prior governmental approval.
This creates an additional stage in the rule-making process and ensures that the exercise of the High Court’s rule-making power operates within the statutory framework established by the CPC.
The provision also identifies the appropriate approving authority according to the location of the Court whose procedure the rules regulate.
Essential Requirements of Section 126
1. Rules must have been made under the foregoing provisions
Section 126 applies to rules made under the preceding rule-making provisions of the CPC.
It should therefore be read together with Sections 122 to 125.
2. Previous approval is mandatory
The rules are subject to previous approval.
This means that the approval must come before the subsequent publication contemplated by Section 127.
3. The appropriate Government depends on the location of the Court
The section creates two categories.
Court situated in a State
Where the Court whose procedure is regulated is situated in a State, the rules require the previous approval of the Government of that State.
Court not situated in any State
Where the relevant Court is not situated in any State, the rules require the previous approval of the Central Government.
How Section 126 CPC Works
The rule-making process can broadly be understood as:
Rule-making power → Rules framed → Previous approval under Section 126 → Publication under Section 127 → Rules acquire prescribed force and effect
Section 126 therefore operates between the making of the rules and their publication.
It is important not to confuse this process with the previous publication mentioned in the proviso to Section 125.
Section 126 and Previous Publication
A common mistake is to associate Section 126 with “previous publication.” That is not the correct statutory position.
Section 125
The proviso to Section 125 deals with previous publication when a High Court seeks to make a rule extending within its jurisdiction rules already made by another High Court.
Section 126
Section 126 deals with previous approval of the appropriate Government for rules made under the foregoing provisions.
Section 127
Section 127 deals with the publication of rules that have been made and approved.
Therefore:
Section 125 → Previous publication in the specified situation
Section 126 → Previous governmental approval
Section 127 → Publication of approved rules
This distinction is particularly important for examinations.
Statutory Rule and Judicial Interpretation
What the CPC provides
Section 126 expressly requires previous approval of the appropriate Government for rules made under the foregoing provisions.
The relevant approving authority is determined by the location of the Court whose procedure the rules regulate.
Judicial interpretation
Section 126 is primarily a statutory procedural requirement concerning the exercise of rule-making power. Its significance lies in the fact that rules framed under the relevant provisions are subject to a prior approval mechanism before publication.
The section should therefore be understood as one stage in the larger statutory process governing the making, approval and publication of CPC rules.
Related Provisions
Section 122 — Power of Certain High Courts to Make Rules
Section 122 confers rule-making powers on the High Courts specified in that provision.
Section 126 subsequently imposes the requirement of previous governmental approval on rules made under the foregoing provisions.
Section 123 — Constitution of Rule Committees
Section 123 deals with the constitution of Rule Committees in certain States.
It forms part of the institutional framework through which procedural rules may be considered and developed.
Section 124 — Committee to Report to High Court
Section 124 requires the Rule Committee to make a report to the High Court concerning proposals to annul, alter or add to rules in the First Schedule or to make new rules.
Section 125 — Power of Other High Courts to Make Rules
Section 125 deals with High Courts other than those specified in Section 122 and permits them to exercise the relevant rule-making powers subject to the conditions stated in that section.
Its proviso separately deals with previous publication when a High Court extends rules made by another High Court.
Section 127 — Publication of Rules
Section 127 provides for the publication of rules that have been made and approved.
It is therefore the provision that follows Section 126 in the rule-making sequence.
Section 128 — Matters for Which Rules May Provide
Section 128 sets out the matters for which rules may provide and requires that such rules not be inconsistent with the provisions contained in the body of the CPC.
Section 126 vs Section 127
This distinction is particularly important.
| Basis | Section 126 | Section 127 |
|---|---|---|
| Subject | Approval of rules | Publication of rules |
| Main requirement | Previous governmental approval | Publication in the Official Gazette |
| Stage | Before publication | After rules have been made and approved |
| Main function | Provides the approval mechanism | Provides the publication mechanism and legal effect |
| Key phrase | Previous approval | Publication of rules |
Easy Way to Remember
Section 126 = Approval
Section 127 = Publication
Section 125 vs Section 126
Another important distinction is between previous publication and previous approval.
| Basis | Section 125 | Section 126 |
|---|---|---|
| Main subject | Extension of rules made by another High Court | Approval of rules made under the foregoing provisions |
| Requirement | Previous publication in the situation covered by the proviso | Previous approval |
| Authority involved | High Court | Appropriate Government |
| Purpose | Gives prior public notice before extending another High Court’s rules | Obtains governmental approval before publication of the rules |
Practical Example
Example: A High Court frames procedural rules for regulating the procedure of Civil Courts within its jurisdiction under the relevant rule-making provisions of the CPC.
The rules cannot simply proceed directly to publication. They must first obtain the required previous approval.
If the Court whose procedure is being regulated is situated in a State, the approval must come from the Government of that State.
Once the rules have been made and approved, Section 127 becomes relevant and provides for their publication and subsequent force and effect.
Practical Importance in Civil Litigation
Section 126 does not ordinarily arise during the conduct of an individual civil suit. Its significance lies at the level of procedural rule-making.
It is relevant when determining:
- the source of procedural rules applicable to Civil Courts;
- the limits and conditions surrounding High Court rule-making powers;
- the role of governmental approval;
- the relationship between Sections 122 to 128; and
- the stage at which procedural rules proceed from being framed to being published.
For advocates, understanding this framework can be useful when examining the statutory basis and procedural validity of rules framed by a High Court.
Common Confusion
“Previous Approval” is not the same as “Previous Publication”
These are two different statutory requirements.
Previous approval under Section 126 refers to approval by the appropriate Government.
Previous publication under the proviso to Section 125 concerns the publication requirement before a High Court extends rules made by another High Court.
Publication under Section 127 refers to the publication of rules after they have been made and approved.
Keeping these three concepts separate avoids a common examination error.
Importance for Law Students and Judiciary Exams
Section 126 is short, but its position in the rule-making sequence makes it important for procedural-law questions.
What to Remember
- Section 126 deals with previous approval of rules.
- Rules made under the foregoing provisions require the approval prescribed by this section.
- If the relevant Court is situated in a State, approval is required from the Government of that State.
- If the relevant Court is not situated in any State, approval is required from the Central Government.
- Section 126 should not be confused with the previous publication requirement in the proviso to Section 125.
- Section 127 deals with the publication of rules after approval.
- Sections 122 to 128 should be studied together as the CPC’s broader rule-making framework.
Important Questions to Prepare
- What is the object of Section 126 CPC?
- What is meant by “previous approval” under Section 126?
- Which Government is competent to approve rules under Section 126?
- Distinguish Section 126 from Section 127 CPC.
- Distinguish previous approval under Section 126 from previous publication under Section 125.
- Explain the position of Section 126 in the rule-making framework of the CPC.
Key Legal Principles
1. Previous approval is a statutory requirement
Rules made under the foregoing provisions are subject to the previous approval prescribed by Section 126.
2. The approving authority depends on the location of the Court
Where the relevant Court is situated in a State, the State Government is the approving authority. Where the Court is not situated in any State, the Central Government is the approving authority.
3. Approval precedes publication
Section 126 operates before the publication contemplated by Section 127.
4. Previous approval and previous publication are different concepts
Previous publication is dealt with in the proviso to Section 125, whereas Section 126 deals with previous governmental approval.
5. Section 126 forms part of a larger statutory scheme
Sections 122 to 128 collectively regulate the making, reporting, approval, publication and permissible scope of procedural rules.
Key Takeaways
| Concept | Principle |
|---|---|
| Section | Section 126 CPC |
| Correct title | Rules to be subject to approval |
| Core rule | Rules made under the foregoing provisions require previous approval |
| State Court | Approval by the Government of the State where the Court is situated |
| Court not situated in a State | Approval by the Central Government |
| Previous publication | Primarily relevant to the proviso to Section 125 |
| Next stage | Publication under Section 127 |
| Key distinction | Section 126 = approval; Section 127 = publication |
ALSO READ: Section 125 – Power of Other High Courts to Make Rules
Conclusion
Section 126 places a requirement of previous governmental approval on rules made under the foregoing rule-making provisions of the CPC. The appropriate approving authority depends upon the location of the Court whose procedure the rules regulate.
The most important point is to distinguish approval from publication. Section 126 deals with previous approval, while Section 127 deals with publication of rules that have been made and approved. The previous publication requirement belongs to the proviso to Section 125.
For examination purposes, remember the sequence:
Rule-making → Previous approval under Section 126 → Publication under Section 127