Jamui Minors’ Harassment Case: SIT Formed, 3 Held, 32 Social Media Accounts Flagged Under POCSO

In Jamui Minors Case, An SIT is probing the alleged harassment of two Class 10 students in Jamui, while police have flagged 32 social media accounts over circulation of footage identifying the minors.

What Happened

Two Class 10 students were allegedly stopped and assaulted by a group of men near Madwa Pahad in Jamui, Bihar, on the evening of September 19, 2026, while they were returning from coaching on a scooter. A video recorded during the incident later circulated widely on social media.

Police subsequently registered an FIR at Jamui Police Station under provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO). Three persons have been arrested in connection with the case. Police said two of those arrested are aged between 17 and 18, making the juvenile status of the accused an important part of the legal process.

A Special Investigation Team (SIT) has also been constituted under the supervision of the Jamui Sub-Divisional Police Officer to investigate the incident and identify the roles of others allegedly involved.

Background & Context

The police investigation has identified approximately seven to eight persons allegedly connected with the incident. Authorities are continuing efforts to trace the remaining suspects and are also verifying their criminal antecedents. Police have said that patrolling arrangements in the area will also be examined.

The case has also expanded beyond the alleged underlying incident. Police are separately examining the online circulation of footage that could identify the minors.

According to police, 32 social media accounts have been identified for takedown action: 13 on Facebook, 12 on Instagram and seven on X. Authorities have warned that circulating material that reveals the identity or face of a minor can attract separate legal consequences.

Join Lexibal’s WhatsApp Community for latest updates.

Key Details

• Forum: The FIR has been registered at Jamui Police Station, with the investigation being conducted by an SIT under the supervision of the Jamui SDPO.
• Date: The alleged incident took place on September 19, 2026. The arrests and formation of the SIT were publicly confirmed on September 21.
• Sections/Acts Invoked: Police have reported invoking provisions of the BNSS and the POCSO Act. Reports identify Sections 128, 74 and 75 of the BNSS and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act in the FIR.
• Juvenile Status: Three persons have been arrested, with police stating that two are aged between 17 and 18. Their treatment in the criminal justice process therefore involves the juvenile justice framework rather than simply being treated as adult accused.
• Online Circulation: Police have flagged 32 social media accounts for takedown action, comprising 13 Facebook accounts, 12 Instagram accounts and seven X accounts.
• Current Status: The investigation remains ongoing, with police attempting to identify and trace other persons allegedly connected with the incident.

Why It Matters

The Jamui case illustrates how a single incident involving children can trigger multiple, legally distinct investigative tracks.

The first concerns the alleged underlying conduct and the application of POCSO provisions where the allegations involve sexual offences against children. The second concerns what happens after the incident, particularly the circulation of material capable of identifying child victims.

Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 places restrictions on the disclosure of identifying information concerning children in specified circumstances. The provision is therefore relevant to the police action against accounts that allegedly circulated material capable of revealing the minors’ identities. Police have also referred to POCSO while warning against such circulation.

That distinction is important. The online dissemination issue is not simply an extension of the investigation into the original allegations. It raises a separate question of whether those who circulated identifying material complied with statutory protections afforded to children.

The case also highlights the procedural significance of the accused being minors in at least two instances. Juvenile status does not end an investigation or remove the possibility of legal proceedings, but it does mean that the applicable process must account for the special framework governing children in conflict with law.

At this stage, the allegations remain under investigation. The arrests, SIT inquiry and identification of social media accounts do not amount to a finding of guilt, and no chargesheet or conviction has been established on the basis of the material presently reported.

Reactions

The incident has generated political and public reactions concerning child safety and law and order in Bihar. Opposition figures have called for accountability and prosecution of those found responsible.

Bihar minister Jama Khan said the investigation was underway and that anyone found guilty would face action. He also said efforts were continuing to apprehend those allegedly involved who had not yet been arrested.

The political responses have formed part of a wider debate over public safety and the administration’s response, while the police investigation itself remains ongoing.

Closing

The Jamui investigation now involves both the alleged conduct against the minors and the subsequent digital circulation of material that may identify them. With an SIT in place, arrests already made and further suspects and online accounts being examined, the next stages will depend on the evidence gathered during the investigation.

For the legal system, the case underscores two parallel concerns: accountability for alleged offences against children and protection of children’s identities after an incident enters the public domain.