Section 139 CPC – Oath on Affidavit

16 Min Read

Introduction

Section 139 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with the manner in which an oath may be administered to a person making an affidavit.

An affidavit is a written statement of facts sworn or affirmed by a person. Section 139 specifies the authorities before whom such an oath or affirmation may be made.

The provision is important because an affidavit becomes part of judicial proceedings only when it is properly sworn or affirmed before an authorised person.


Section at a Glance

ParticularDetails
SectionSection 139 CPC
SubjectOath on affidavit
NatureProcedural
Main purposeTo identify who may administer the oath or affirmation for an affidavit
Persons authorisedCourts and specified judicial and other authorities
Key conceptAffidavit must be properly sworn or affirmed
Related provisionOrder XIX CPC

Statutory Provision

Section 139 CPC provides:

“Oath on affidavit by whom to be administered.—In the case of any affidavit under this Code—

(a) any Court or Magistrate, or

(aa) any notary appointed under the Notaries Act, 1952 (53 of 1952), or

(b) any officer or other person whom a High Court may appoint in this behalf, or

(c) any officer appointed by any other Court which the State Government has specially empowered in this behalf,

may administer the oath to the deponent.”


Meaning of Section 139 CPC

In simple words:

Section 139 specifies the persons or authorities who are legally authorised to administer the oath to a person making an affidavit under the CPC.

The Section does not deal primarily with the contents of an affidavit.

Instead, it answers an important procedural question:

“Before whom should an affidavit be sworn or affirmed?”

The answer is given through the categories listed in Section 139.


Purpose and Object of Section 139

The main purpose of Section 139 is to ensure that affidavits filed in civil proceedings are properly sworn or affirmed before an authorised authority.

The provision helps maintain the authenticity and procedural validity of affidavits.

It also prevents affidavits from being treated as properly sworn merely because a person has signed them.

Therefore:

Signing an affidavit ≠ necessarily properly swearing an affidavit.

The oath or affirmation must be administered by an authority recognised under Section 139 or the applicable procedural rules.


Who Can Administer the Oath?

Section 139 identifies several categories of persons and authorities.

1. Any Court or Magistrate

Under Section 139(a), an affidavit may be sworn or affirmed before:

  • Any Court; or
  • Any Magistrate.

The Court or Magistrate can administer the oath to the person making the affidavit.


2. Notary

Section 139(aa) specifically recognises:

Any notary appointed under the Notaries Act, 1952.

Therefore, a notary appointed under the relevant statutory framework may administer the oath to the deponent.

This is an important addition to the Section.

Remember:

Notary → Section 139(aa)


3. Officer or Person Appointed by the High Court

Under Section 139(b), an officer or other person whom the High Court appoints for this purpose may administer the oath.

The High Court therefore has the power to designate appropriate persons to administer oaths on affidavits.

This allows the procedural system to operate efficiently without requiring every affidavit to be sworn personally before a Court.


4. Officer Appointed by Another Court

Section 139(c) provides another category.

An officer appointed by another Court may administer the oath if:

  1. The Court has appointed the officer for this purpose; and
  2. The State Government has specially empowered that Court in this behalf.

Thus, the provision creates a statutory mechanism through which other Courts can appoint officers to administer oaths.


The Four Main Categories

For examination purposes, Section 139 can be remembered as:

C – N – H – O

C → Court or Magistrate

N → Notary

H → High Court-appointed officer/person

O → Officer appointed by another specially empowered Court


Section 139 and Affidavits

An affidavit is commonly used in civil proceedings for placing factual statements before the Court.

Affidavits may be required or permitted in various procedural situations.

For example, affidavits may be used in connection with:

  • Applications;
  • Interlocutory proceedings;
  • Evidence by affidavit;
  • Procedural matters;
  • Verification of factual statements.

Section 139 ensures that the oath or affirmation attached to such an affidavit is administered by an authorised person.


Oath and Affirmation

The Section refers to administering the oath to the deponent.

In practice, the legal framework also recognises affirmation where applicable.

The essential point is that the deponent formally declares the truth of the statements contained in the affidavit before an authorised person.

The person administering the oath or affirmation must have legal authority to do so.


Who Is the Deponent?

The deponent is the person who makes and swears or affirms the affidavit.

For example:

If A makes an affidavit stating certain facts and swears to its correctness before a notary, A is the deponent.

The person administering the oath is not the deponent.


Section 139 and Order XIX CPC

Section 139 should be read together with Order XIX of the CPC, which deals with affidavits.

The distinction is important:

Section 139

Deals with:

Who may administer the oath on an affidavit.

Order XIX

Deals more broadly with:

  • Affidavits;
  • Evidence by affidavit;
  • Orders for evidence to be given by affidavit;
  • Cross-examination of deponents in appropriate circumstances.

Therefore:

Section 139 = Authority to administer oath

Order XIX = Procedural rules relating to affidavits


Practical Example

Suppose A needs to file an affidavit in a civil proceeding.

A prepares the affidavit and appears before a person legally authorised under Section 139.

The authorised person administers the oath or affirmation to A.

A then swears or affirms the contents of the affidavit.

The affidavit can thereafter be presented in the relevant proceeding in accordance with the applicable procedural requirements.


Example Involving a Notary

A prepares an affidavit for use in a civil proceeding.

A approaches a properly appointed notary.

The notary administers the oath and completes the required attestation.

The notary is an expressly recognised authority under Section 139(aa).


Example Involving a High Court-Appointed Officer

Suppose a High Court appoints a particular officer to administer oaths for affidavits under Section 139(b).

A person making an affidavit may swear or affirm the affidavit before that authorised officer.

The authority of the officer comes from the appointment made by the High Court.


Important Point: Mere Signature Is Not Enough

A person cannot ordinarily treat an affidavit as properly sworn merely because:

  • The person signed it;
  • The contents appear truthful;
  • The document is titled “affidavit.”

The procedural requirement concerning the administration of the oath or affirmation must also be satisfied.

Section 139 identifies the authorities who can perform that function.


Section 139 and Verification

Swearing an affidavit and verifying a pleading are related but distinct procedural concepts.

Affidavit

An affidavit is sworn or affirmed before an authorised person.

Verification of Pleading

A pleading is verified in accordance with the applicable CPC provisions, particularly Order VI.

Therefore, Section 139 should not be treated as the general provision governing verification of every pleading.


Section 139 vs Section 137 CPC

BasisSection 137Section 139
SubjectLanguage of subordinate CourtsOath on affidavit
Main focusLanguage used in judicial proceedingsAuthority who administers oath
Key authorityState Government / applicable frameworkCourt, Magistrate, Notary, High Court-appointed person, etc.
NatureLanguage provisionAffidavit procedure

Section 139 vs Order XIX CPC

BasisSection 139Order XIX
Main subjectAdministration of oathAffidavits and evidence by affidavit
Key questionWho may administer the oath?How are affidavits used in proceedings?
FunctionIdentifies authorised personsRegulates affidavit procedure
ImportanceValid swearing/affirmationUse and treatment of affidavit evidence

Important Features of Section 139

1. It applies to affidavits under the CPC

The Section specifically concerns affidavits made under the Code.

2. It identifies authorised persons

The Section provides several categories of persons who may administer the oath.

3. Courts and Magistrates are included

Any Court or Magistrate may administer the oath.

4. Notaries are expressly recognised

A notary appointed under the Notaries Act, 1952 is included under Section 139(aa).

5. High Courts may appoint officers or persons

The High Court may appoint persons for administering oaths.

6. Other Courts may also have appointed officers

This is possible where the Court has been specially empowered by the State Government.


Common Confusions About Section 139

1. Section 139 does not determine the truth of the affidavit

It only identifies who may administer the oath.

2. Every person cannot administer an oath

The person administering the oath must fall within one of the categories recognised by the Section.

3. Not every signed statement is an affidavit

An affidavit requires compliance with the applicable procedural requirements, including proper swearing or affirmation.

4. Section 139 is different from Order XIX

Section 139 concerns the administration of oath, while Order XIX deals with the procedural use of affidavits.

5. Verification and swearing are different

Verification of pleadings and swearing of affidavits are distinct procedural acts.


Practical Importance in Civil Litigation

Section 139 is relevant whenever a party intends to file an affidavit in a civil proceeding.

Before filing an affidavit, practitioners should ensure:

  1. The affidavit is properly prepared.
  2. The deponent signs it.
  3. The oath or affirmation is administered by an authorised person.
  4. The required attestation is completed.
  5. The affidavit complies with the applicable Court rules.
  6. Any prescribed format or procedural requirement is followed.

Failure to comply with procedural requirements can result in objections concerning the affidavit.


Importance for Law Students and Judiciary Exams

Section 139 is frequently tested through questions asking:

Who can administer an oath on an affidavit under the CPC?

What to Remember

  1. Section 139 deals with oath on affidavit.
  2. Any Court or Magistrate may administer the oath.
  3. A notary appointed under the Notaries Act, 1952 may administer the oath.
  4. An officer or other person appointed by the High Court may administer the oath.
  5. An officer appointed by another Court may administer the oath where that Court has been specially empowered by the State Government.
  6. The person making the affidavit is called the deponent.
  7. Section 139 should be read with Order XIX CPC.

Important Questions to Prepare

  1. What is the object of Section 139 CPC?
  2. Who can administer an oath on an affidavit?
  3. Can a Magistrate administer an oath under Section 139?
  4. Can a notary administer an oath on an affidavit?
  5. What is the role of a High Court-appointed officer under Section 139?
  6. Under what circumstances can an officer appointed by another Court administer an oath?
  7. Who is called a deponent?
  8. Distinguish Section 139 from Order XIX CPC.
  9. Distinguish swearing of an affidavit from verification of a pleading.

Key Legal Principles

1. Affidavits must be properly sworn or affirmed

The procedural validity of an affidavit involves more than merely signing the document.

2. The authority administering the oath must be recognised

Section 139 specifies the categories of persons who may administer the oath.

3. Notaries have express statutory recognition

Section 139(aa) specifically recognises notaries appointed under the Notaries Act, 1952.

4. High Courts have appointment power

The High Court may appoint officers or other persons for administering oaths.

5. Special empowerment is required for certain other Courts

An officer appointed by another Court can administer the oath where the statutory requirement concerning special empowerment by the State Government is satisfied.


Key Takeaways

ConceptPrinciple
SectionSection 139 CPC
SubjectOath on affidavit
Main purposeIdentifies authorities who may administer the oath
Court/MagistrateMay administer the oath
NotaryMay administer the oath
High Court-appointed personMay administer the oath
Officer of specially empowered CourtMay administer the oath
Person making affidavitDeponent
Related provisionOrder XIX CPC

ALSO READ: Section 138 – Evidence to Be Recorded in English

Conclusion

Section 139 CPC provides the procedural framework for determining who may administer the oath to a person making an affidavit under the Code. It recognises Courts and Magistrates, properly appointed notaries, persons or officers appointed by the High Court, and officers appointed by other Courts that have been specially empowered by the State Government.

The Section is therefore important for ensuring that affidavits placed before civil Courts are properly sworn or affirmed.

Easy Formula to Remember

Section 139 = Court/Magistrate + Notary + High Court-Appointed Person + Specially Empowered Court Officer → Oath on Affidavit.

Share This Article
[fluentform id="3"]

👀 Attention, Lex Fam!

Lexibal is trusted by a community of 100K+ and growing law students and legal professionals across India. A fast-growing legal community that’s learning, sharing, and leveling up together — and you’re invited to be part of it too.

Social Media

Stay Connected

Follow Lexibal on your favourite platforms.

Instagram
Follow
Telegram
Join
- Advertisement -
Join WhatsApp