Section 66 CPC — Suit Against Purchaser

3 Min Read

Section 66 CPC deals with suits concerning property purchased in an execution sale and places restrictions on certain claims relating to the benami nature of an execution purchase.

Section at a Glance

ParticularDetails
SectionSection 66 CPC
SubjectSuit against purchaser
NatureProcedural
Main purposeRegulates claims concerning execution-sale purchases
Present statusRepealed
Related provisionOrder XXI

Section 66 CPC has been repealed.

It was historically concerned with suits brought against a person in whose name property had been purchased at an execution sale, where another person claimed that the purchase had actually been made on their behalf.

The provision therefore has no operative effect under the present CPC.

Historical Purpose

Before its repeal, Section 66 restricted certain suits based on allegations that:

  • Property had been purchased at an execution sale in the name of one person; but
  • The purchase had actually been made on behalf of another person.

The provision was intended to prevent litigation based on undisclosed or benami claims concerning execution-sale purchases.

Effect of Repeal

Since Section 66 is repealed, its former statutory restrictions cannot be treated as the current law.

Any present dispute involving an execution-sale purchaser must be examined under the law currently in force, including applicable property, succession and benami legislation where relevant.

Relationship with Section 65

Section 65 deals with the title acquired by a purchaser at an execution sale.

Section 66 historically dealt with certain suits challenging the apparent ownership of an execution-sale purchaser.

The two provisions therefore addressed different aspects of execution-sale purchases.

Importance for Law Students and Judiciary Exams

What to Remember

  • Section 66 CPC is repealed.
  • It historically dealt with suits against execution-sale purchasers involving claims of beneficial or undisclosed ownership.
  • It has no present operative effect.
  • Current disputes must be examined under the law presently applicable.

ALSO READ: Section 64 – Private Alienation After Attachment

Opportunities don’t wait. Neither should you.

Join 1 Lakh+ law students connected with Lexibal and stay updated with internships, opportunities, competitions and important updates.

Join WhatsApp Channel

Key Takeaways

ConceptPrinciple
SectionSection 66 CPC
StatusRepealed
Historical subjectSuits concerning execution-sale purchasers
Present effectNo operative statutory rule
Related provisionSection 65 and Order XXI
Share This Article
THE LEXIBAL COMMUNITY

Your law-school circle just got bigger.

Lexibal is now a 100K+ strong community of law students and legal professionals across India — sharing opportunities, learning together and growing every day.

100K+ law students & professionals Join the community
Lexibal Community 1 Lakh+ Law Students
[fluentform id="3"]

Submit an Opportunity

Know of an internship, job, moot or call for papers? Share it with Lexibal.

Learn how to submit

ADVERTISING

Advertise on Lexibal

Connect with law students across India through relevant ads, courses, events and opportunities.

Your support helps us keep opportunities and resources free for law students.
Enquire about advertising

Do You Know?

The Supreme Court can review its own judgments, but only on limited legal grounds.

Beyond the Bare Act

A little legal insight for your day

LEGAL INSIGHT

Discover something new about the world of law.