Income from House Property is one of the most scoring and predictable areas under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite its apparent simplicity, the topic requires a conceptual understanding of ownership, annual value computation, deductions, and treatment of unrealized rent or vacancy. Under Sections 22 to 27, the Act clearly identifies what constitutes income from house property and how it must be computed for taxation. For law students, this chapter is crucial not only academically but also for practical interpretation, as disputes frequently arise regarding ownership, notional rent, and deductions.
The fundamental principle is that tax is imposed on the inherent capacity of the property to earn income, not necessarily on the actual receipt of rent. This was affirmed in Sultan Brothers Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (1964), where the Supreme Court held that the taxability arises from ownership combined with the property’s potential to generate revenue. Thus, even a vacant property may attract notional taxation under certain circumstances.
Meaning of House Property and Scope of Taxation
House property refers to any building or land appurtenant thereto. The term covers residential homes, commercial buildings, shops, godowns, and any other structure capable of being used as property. Section 22 mandates that for an income to be classified under this head, three essential conditions must be fulfilled:
- There must be a building or land appurtenant to it.
- The assessee must be the owner.
- The property must not be used for business or profession carried on by the assessee.
The Supreme Court in East India Housing and Land Development Trust Ltd. v. CIT (1961) clarified that even if a building is commercially exploited (e.g., as a shopping center), income from letting out the property must still be taxed under “Income from House Property,” not “Profits and Gains of Business,” unless the letting is part of the assessee’s main business.
Ownership need not be legally complete or registered. In CIT v. Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd. (1997), the Court held that beneficial ownership—such as possession and enjoyment coupled with the right to receive income—is sufficient for taxation under this head.
Tip: Always remember: beneficial ownership is enough. Legal title is not mandatory for taxability.
Types of Property for Tax Purposes
Self-Occupied Property (SOP)
A self-occupied property is one used by the owner for their own residence. Since such property does not generate income, its Annual Value is taken as Nil. However, interest on borrowed capital is deductible up to ₹2,00,000 under Section 24(b), provided certain conditions are met.
If the assessee owns more than two properties for self-use, only two can be treated as self-occupied; the rest are deemed “Let Out.”
Let-Out Property (LOP)
A let-out property generates rental income. Its taxation is based on the higher of actual rent received or receivable and its reasonable expected rent. This category often involves intricate computations, especially regarding municipal value, fair rent, and standard rent.
Deemed Let-Out Property (DLOP)
When an assessee owns more than two self-occupied houses, all additional properties are treated as deemed let-out. Even if no actual rent is received, notional Annual Value must be computed. This principle was upheld in Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Indian Oil Corporation (1991), which recognized notional assessment based on potential value.
Tip: For deemed let-out properties, actual rent doesn’t matter—compute the notional rent.
Computation of Annual Value
Annual Value, defined under Section 23, is the cornerstone of this chapter. For let-out or deemed let-out property, Annual Value is determined as:
Annual Value = Higher of Expected Rent or Actual Rent Received/Receivable (subject to vacancy allowance)
Expected Rent is the higher of:
- Municipal Value
- Fair Rent
but restricted to Standard Rent where the Rent Control Act applies.
The concept of Expected Rent prevents landlords from artificially reducing rent to evade taxes. Courts have regularly upheld this principle, most notably in Dewan Daulat Rai Kapoor v. NDMC (1980), where the Supreme Court held that standard rent acts as the ceiling for expected rent to prevent arbitrary increases in notional assessment.
Vacancy Allowance
If a property remains vacant despite reasonable efforts to let it out, and actual rent is lower than the expected rent, the actual rent is considered. This is particularly beneficial for owners in slow rental markets.
Unrealized Rent
Unrealized rent can be excluded from computation only if recovery steps have been taken. Rule 4 of the Income Tax Rules lays down strict conditions. Courts have reiterated that mere default by the tenant is insufficient unless eviction or legal action is initiated.
Tip: Always check if the rent shortfall is due to vacancy or default—treatment differs.
Deductions Under Section 24
Section 24 provides two major deductions:
1. Standard Deduction – 30% of Net Annual Value
This deduction is available irrespective of actual expenditure. Even if the landlord spends nothing on repairs, 30% deduction is allowed. In CIT v. Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd. (2015), the Court reaffirmed that income from leasing of property—even as business income—allows statutory deductions where applicable.
2. Interest on Borrowed Capital
Interest deduction is allowed for both self-occupied and let-out properties.
- For SOP: Maximum ₹2,00,000
- For LOP/DLOP: No limit; entire interest allowed
Current legal interpretation ensures that pre-construction interest is spread over 5 years.
Tip: Interest deduction for let-out property has no upper ceiling—use it wisely in planning scenarios.
Taxation of Arrears and Unrealized Rent Recovered
Section 25A provides that arrears of rent and unrealized rent recovered later will be fully taxable in the year of receipt, irrespective of ownership during that year. The Supreme Court in CIT v. Shambhu Investment (2003) emphasized that rent-related receipts are always taxable under this head, regardless of when they are received.
Exemptions and Special Cases
Co-Ownership
Under Section 26, if a property is owned jointly, each co-owner is taxed individually on their share of income. This provides significant relief where income is split.
Property Used for Own Business
If the property is used for business carried on by the assessee, it is not taxable under this head. This principle flows from Section 22 itself.
Tip: A property used for business is never taxed as house property—avoid double taxation.
Judicial Approach to House Property Taxation
Indian courts consistently emphasize that the essence of taxability lies in ownership and rental potential. Key doctrines include:
- Potential Capacity Doctrine – Property is taxed on what it can earn.
- Beneficial Ownership Doctrine – Possession plus right to income = owner for tax purposes.
- Rent Control Ceiling Doctrine – Standard rent caps notional rent.
These doctrines protect taxpayers from arbitrary assessments while ensuring compliance.
Conclusion
“Income from House Property” remains a structured yet nuanced head of income that requires a clear understanding of ownership concepts, annual value determination, and deductions. Judicial precedents have shaped its modern interpretation, balancing taxpayer protection with revenue interests. For law students, mastering these provisions provides a strong foundation for deeper practice in tax law, litigation, and advisory roles.
Also Read